Retrospective Review: Revenge of the Sith

In preparation for The Force Awakens, I’m rewatching all six Star Wars films and sharing my thoughts here. This week, I look at Revenge of the Sith, the film that finally showed us Anakin’s fall. (originally published at Legendarium Media)Star-Wars-Episode-III-Revenge-of-the-Sith-2005

Revenge of the Sith dominates the Prequel Trilogy in a way that none of the classic films dominates the Original Trilogy. In interviews, George Lucas admitted that this movie contains over 60% of the material from his original story outlines (with The Phantom Menace and Attack of the Clones splitting the remaining 40%). Many consider ROTS to be the best of the Prequels, but it has way too much story to cover in two hours. Anakin Skywalker’s fall to the Dark Side happens too quickly to be believed. Major characters like Padmé Amidala have no character arc on screen. The ending races to wrap up several major plot lines and set everything up for A New Hope. As much as I enjoy the film for its standout moments, it always felt a bit too rushed.

When I expressed my disappointment to other Star Wars fans, they suggested I read Matthew Stover’s Revenge of the Sith novelization. I was skeptical, to say the least. I’d considered movie novelizations to be cheap cash grabs by studios. I’d heard horror stories about how authors have to work under incredibly short deadlines with little or no access to the filmmakers. Some are lucky to see concept art, much less a cut of the final film. For example, Alan Dean Foster (who, coincidentally, is also writing the novelization for The Force Awakens) famously could not even see images of the alien for his novelization of Alien! Not surprisingly, the average movie novelization is simply a translation of the script into prose, with possibly a few scenes that had been deleted from the final cut. This was acceptable back during the 1980s, when the only way to relive the adventure was on the printed page, but with DVDs and blu-rays surely novelizations had gone the way of the Betamax. Or so I thought…

SW Book

In fact, I didn’t read the Revenge of the Sith novelization until around 2010. Ultimately, I’m glad I did. The novel helps to explain what was depicted on screen. It fleshes out the story in countless ways, but most importantly it clarifies Anakin’s motivations for going to the Dark Side. In the movie, Anakin comes across as petulant when he complains about not being awarded the rank of Master. The book explains that Anakin sought restricted knowledge in the Jedi library that might save Padmé from death and had hoped the rank of Master would grant him access to the archives. Stover also spends more time on the political maneuvering between the Jedi and Palpatine, showing how Anakin finds himself caught in the middle. Meanwhile, Palpatine provides a fairly convincing explanation of Sith philosophy as one that embraces human existence rather than the Jedi dogma of non-attachment. In short, Anakin’s decision makes much more sense and comes across as even more tragic than what comes across in the final film.

However, Stover’s novel does more than just expand upon and explain what happened on screen. He takes advantage of his medium to tell the story in a new way. The narration plays an important role in setting the stage and contextualizing the story. One of my favorite passages comes in the introduction, which assesses the mood of the public after it learns that Chancellor Palpatine had been kidnapped. The adults panic, but the children believe that Anakin and Obi-Wan Kenobi will save the day. The narration continues:

Anakin and Obi-Wan. Kenobi and Skywalker… Younglings across the galaxy know their names, know everything about them, follow their exploits as though they are sports heroes instead
of warriors in a desperate battle to save civilization… All the younglings watching the battle in Coruscant’s sky know it: when Anakin and Obi-Wan get there, those dirty Seppers
are going to wish they’d stayed in bed today.

The adults know better, of course. That’s part of what being a grown-up is: understanding that heroes are created by the HoloNet, and that the real-life Kenobi and Skywalker are
only human beings, after all. (page 4-5)

This passage brilliantly not just establishes the camaraderie between Anakin and Obi-Wan—something the films themselves arguably never did—but also gets at the core tension in the story, and indeed the Star Wars franchise. Yes, the Jedi are superheroes with extraordinary powers who fight evil. But they’re also only human beings, with all the flaws and virtues that entails. Both the children and adults are right, but neither appreciates the bigger picture. Anakin is both the conquering hero who routs Separatist armies and the insecure teenager who gives in to his human lust and anger.

Anakin

Stover also manages to provide brief but memorable character vignettes that get to the heart of the major characters. His description of Obi-Wan as the Jedi who excels in both wisdom and combat but is too humble to recognize his achievements perfectly encapsulates Obi-Wan as the quintessential servant-warrior. For Anakin, Stover uses an extended metaphor of a dragon in his heart remaindering him of what he has lost and stands to lose. It’s an effective way of depicting the character’s inner turmoil (something difficult for even the best actors to convey on screen without extensive monologues). Even Count Dooku, who was criminally underutilized in the films, gets a whole chapter exploring his psyche.

Stover’s novelization can’t stand alone, especially as it can’t convey the film’s stunning visuals, but it supports the movie in a way that few other novelizations have. Although Lucasfilm obviously meant for the movie to take priority, the two feel like equally important components of the same story. Star Wars expert Nathan P. Butler even coined the term “Stover effect” to express how reading a novelization can improve the overall quality of the source film. In fact, I can’t recall any other instance in which a movie and its novelization complemented each other so well. It’s a shame that more artists haven’t tried multimedia storytelling, using different media as complementary storytelling devices.* Lucas and Stover show how it can enhance the overall experience.

* Ironically, Arthur C. Clarke and Stanley Kubrick collaborated on 2001: Space Odyssey, but there are several major contradictions (in the book, the Discovery goes to Saturn, not Jupiter). Moreover, the movie so overshadowed the book that Clarke’s sequel follows the film, not his own novel.

Advertisements

About Dom

I study constitutional politics in Southeast Asia and I occasionally work as a consultant for rule of law projects. I enjoy science fiction and fantasy stories, both as an escape and as a way to better understand our world. One day, I hope to write a book about politics in genre literature.
This entry was posted in Movies, Star Wars and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Retrospective Review: Revenge of the Sith

  1. dnardimd says:

    Well done… not only have you inspired me to rematch the movies, but now I can’t wait to read the novels ….

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s